Patrick
Dec 14 2003, 08:38 AM
Now that he has been caught... what should we do with him?
Charlotte
Dec 14 2003, 12:36 PM
I don't know.
Try to catch Ben Laden, maybe?
Slan go foill
playing cats and mice
Sean
Dec 14 2003, 04:55 PM
He could be a great X-mas present for the iraqi kurds. Just to deliver Saddam to them (do you remeber gas attacks against the kurds at the North of Iraq?)... But they are moslems and do not celebrate X-mas.
Fionas
Dec 15 2003, 01:01 AM
they didn't catch Saddam, they catched Santa Clause
Fianna
Dec 15 2003, 04:56 PM
If the Iraqis had any sense they would've killed Saddam and burned his body while the US were still hunting for him.
That way the US troops would never have found the boogeyman they so desperately wanted more than anything else, and the Iraqi resistance would have a hero and martyr for future generations.
Sl�n
Saddam Hussein - World Hide And Seek Champion 2003
ChrisyBhoy
Dec 15 2003, 05:41 PM
lmao! Fuck no!
Ol' Sammy Laden is whippin Saddams arse in the Hide and Seek Competition
And they should lock him in a room with Ian Paisley, Maggie Thatcher and the Queen, for a week.
That way, if he isnt first shouted down and insulted enough, he can be classed with the rest of the room and made to pay more taxes than he should be. And if neither of them work, he can be waved at and bored to death.
Or lock him up in a cell with a big randy black fella named Bubba.
Lancashire
Dec 15 2003, 07:18 PM
I reckon that if the Americans or British caught another terrorist similar to Saddam (and that terrorist is called Gerry Adams), then you would all start complaining that we have caught him, because you are a nation who breeds your own terrorists but complain when other nations do the same thing. And then when Britain and America go to war against Terror, the Irish stay neutral, either because they are too weak or too scared to fight without the use of bombs on innocent British civilians.
Fionas
Dec 16 2003, 01:43 AM
hmmm, last time I've watched a TV Show about "peace diplomats" (or so, sorry, don't know the exact english word), there they telled about a journalist in Belfast who was shot by loyalist terror groups...
and if america would think like you, they would think like you, they would hunt the queen instead of Bin Laden or Saddam
most so called "irish terrorist groups" are fighting for a free Ireland, and if that mades them to terrorists, the whole american history would be full of terrorists...
ChrisyBhoy
Dec 16 2003, 02:25 AM
QUOTE (Lancashire @ Dec 15 2003, 07:18 PM) |
I reckon that if the Americans or British caught another terrorist similar to Saddam (and that terrorist is called Gerry Adams), then you would all start complaining that we have caught him, because you are a nation who breeds your own terrorists but complain when other nations do the same thing. And then when Britain and America go to war against Terror, the Irish stay neutral, either because they are too weak or too scared to fight without the use of bombs on innocent British civilians. |
Gerry Adams is a politician these days. And he is nowhere near on the level of Saddam Hussein.
Every nation breeds their own terrorists, you fucking spastic.
When Britain and USA went to war with Terror? You two werent the only ones. Australia, Spain, Italy, New Zealand, they all joined in.
Irish stayed neutral because it has better reasons, your a fucking braind-dead little gobshite arent you. How about you hawl your Loyalist streak-of-pish self outta here and dont come back.
Bj�rn
Dec 16 2003, 04:45 AM
Behave!
Sean
Dec 16 2003, 05:26 AM
lancashire,
1. That was no War against terror, it was the new round of Colonial Wars. Fightin' for oil. And they of course call it in elevated style.
2. Eire doesn't "breeds own terrorists ", She breeds the Freedom Fighters.
3. I don't like you. You do not use your brains to think, you use it only for watchin' TV and readin' newspapers. And for to eat.
Christophe
Dec 16 2003, 10:07 AM
Hmm, Lancashire should think about some of these things:
By whom was Saddam supported in the beginning? The very U.S.A. and allies...
By whom was Bin-Laden trained and supported in the beginning? The very C.I.A....
By whom was Pinochet supported? U.S.A.
By whom was the Argentinian junta supported? U.S.A. (With large approval of H. Kissinger, winner of the Nobelprize of peace you imagine... )
and so on...
The U.S.A. are breeding their terrorists all over the world, just by the way they behave (foreign policy). Now they're just getting the bill back for their years of oppressive foreign policy.
P.S. Lancashire, your comments are worth notting...
Sean
Dec 17 2003, 12:50 AM
Christophe, in the beginning Iraq was supported by USSR, Iran was supported by USA. Trust me. Iraqi Kalashnikovs against Iranish M-16.
Christophe
Dec 20 2003, 02:47 PM
QUOTE |
Christophe, in the beginning Iraq was supported by USSR, Iran was supported by USA. Trust me. Iraqi Kalashnikovs against Iranish M-16. |
Well, than that must have been before the Iranian "Islamic revolution". USA helped Saddam in war against Iran by giving them for example intelligence information: CIA gave positions of Iranian troop positions to Saddam... That's what I know about it...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.